Oedipus Rex Innocence vs Guilt free essay sample

A feeling of remorse arising from a real or imagined commission of an offense It is dvantageous if a person has full knowledge. Having that full knowledge can be useful to him/ her in many ways. One can use it to help his/ her own self and other people whenever problems are encountered. He/ she can devise ways to solve whatever problems he/ she or other people might face. He/she can come up with the most effective solutions to the conflicts because he/she already know the causes and effects, consequences and results of each problem and solution. But what is better in having full knowledge is that a person can find ways to avoid he problem; Just like in the health posters, Prevention is better than cure. And if a person cannot avoid it, at least he can be prepared for it. Thus, he/she do not need to experience more pain and sufferings that the problem might bring. We will write a custom essay sample on Oedipus Rex: Innocence vs Guilt or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Another implication of full knowledge is that one can gain respect and self- esteem. Many people will look highly on him/her because of that full knowledge. They will respect him/her because he/she is a symbol of truth and knowledge. Choragos: This is Teiresias, this is the holy prophet In whom, alone of all men, truth was born(Fitts and Fitzgerald: 485). Also, people will consider him/her as a great person, which may increase a persons self-esteem. And because of this, there is a tendency that other people will make him/her leader or ruler of the group or society. And if not a leader, he/she might be regarded as their guide in their lives. But aside from all those advantages of full knowledge, it has also its disadvantage. Having full knowledge can be troublesome, too. First, it is because it might affect a persons relationship with other people. Some people, if they know that he possesses full knowledge, might not approach him because they are afraid. They think that since he knows all, only their wrong doings and thoughts are the one to be noticed and as a result, they will be mocked or ridiculed by him. Also, people will be scared to face him because of his knowledge about others lives, and if they do something unpleasant to him, he might turn back on them. Secondly, it is troublesome because there are facts and situations that are hard to accept. If he cannot accept it, there will be some tendencies that he will become insane, or worst, end his own life. But even if the fact/ situation is already accepted, nother problem still arouse, and that is when other people wanted to hear about it. It is hard to speak about what he knows because it may harm others. Teiresias: How But made myself forget. I should not have come. (Fitts and Fitzgerald: 505). Having only partial knowledge has its own danger. If only partial knowledge is possessed by a person, he might make a mistake or do inappropriate actions. The assumptions he makes about a person or a situation might be wrong, which may lead to another, greater problem. Instead of being able to solve the conflict, it only become worst because the whole detail was not present. Another danger of partial knowledge is that the people will be having a hard time solving the conflict they are facing. And because of it, their sufferings will be prolonged. Choragos: The King was said to have been killed by a highwaymen Oedipus: I know But we have no witnesses(Fitts and Fitzgerald: 485) One of the problems of Oedipus was that he did know his real origin. The statement Know thyself is significant because if Oedipus fully know himself, the crimes he had committed might be prevented from happening. Having known his own self, of course, include his real origin. It is because his origin was of his identity. But since he did not try to discover more about himself, the parricide and incest happened. In the beginning, Oedipus does not examine all of what he has done in his life so far. He only knew what good he has done to the people around him, and that made him too proud. And because of this he did not pursuit to acquire more information about his life. One can not fill a cup that is already full. Oedipus is a tragic character, but at the same time, a pathetic one. He is a tragic because he suffered so much especially when he learned that he is the murderer hom he seeks. He possesses wisdom, power and wealth but because of the crime, all of it went to waste. But Oedipus is also pathetic because he attempt to escape Corinth to avoid the prophecy, yet he ended up fulfilling the prophecy. It is because he did not first confirm if the mother and father that were in the prophecy were Polybos and Merope of Corinth; and he did not find evidences that they were his real parents. If he find evidences, then there is a possibility that his life would not lead to what the prophecy foretold. Hes pathetic because he became a victim (of the ncidents that happened upon him), he could only do but to react. Oedipus came to life because of Laios and Jocaste, yet had been wished also by them to be destroyed that in the very beginning, Oedipus has not been given a choice. 3. Yes, Oedipus is morally and legally guilty of his crimes he has committed the action. And parricide and incest is against the moral values and law of the society. His ignorance of information/ knowledge does Justify his crimes. Oedipus should have tried to discover more about him. He should have look for evidences that Justify that he was he son of Polybos and Merope, especially when he heard what the drunken man have said about him. Oedipus: At a feast, a drunken man maundering in his cups Cries out that I am not my fathers son! (Fitts and Fitzgerald: 498) After he heard that, asked his parents about it and learned that it was a lie, he must be comforted and felt at ease already. But a strange feeling was still in his mind, right from then and there, he should have seek for evidences about the statements of the drunk man and his parents. Oedipus: yet the suspicion remained always aching in my mind. I knew here was talk; I could not rest (Fitts and Fitzgerald: 499) He should be the one to Delphi, since he was dismissed, he should be more determined to find the truth about his origin. But since he did not do further investigations, even though he has suspicions, he ended up committing the crimes. On his way to a new Journey, though he has a reason, it is still not righteous to slay a man and his guards Just to claim a right of way. What is the value of that road compared to the lives of men? Reasonable or not, people decides for themselves thus people have choices and choices are followed by responsibilities.

Essay about Employement Law Compliance Plan

Essay about Employement Law Compliance Plan Essay about Employement Law Compliance Plan Atwood and allen consulting to: Traci goldeman from: jessica stroklund subject: Landslide Limousine employment law compliance date: cc: Bradley stone After researching employment laws for Landslide Limousine, I have found four major laws that will be applicable. This memo will give an overview of each law as well as noncompliance consequences for each law. The first employment law I would like to bring to your attention is the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This law prohibits employers from discriminating based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin (EEOC, n.d.). The exception to this law is that it does not protect applicants and employees that are younger than the age of 40 (Welte, 2015). Bradley would need to be mindful of employees that are hired and their interaction with one another. He can easily be held accountable for employees poking fun at an elderly employee because of their driving skills, or eye sight. Also, Bradley mentioned wanting to have a high end driving service. Often times this includes having a specific employee personality; when looking for this, he should be mindful to not judge individuals based on their looks or beliefs. Consequences of non-compliance often leads to an investigation with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Valid complaints result in lawsuits and heavy pay outs to the wro nged employee. The second law I would like to mention involves Titles I and Disabilities Act of 1990. This law prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals with disabilities (EEOC, n.d.). Every business is required to accommodate individuals with disabilities. This is important for Bradley to understand because he will need to be very clear about the requirements for each position, as well as be open minded about having in office positions for administration purposes for individuals who may not be able to drive. Disability does not just mean physical, there may be an applicant who is not able to drive at night or due to their anxiety cannot drive in rush hour traffic. Having accommodating shifts is one way to avoid violating this law. Noncompliance can also result in an investigation or lawsuit. A third law that I would like to inform Bradley of is the Equal Pay Act of 1963 as well as the Texas Minimum Wage Act. This is important for him, because he mentioned starting his company in Austin Texas. The first part of this law, the Equal Pay Act protects employees from wage discrimination based on their sex. In other words, employees should be paid based of their job performance, skills and level of responsibility within the same job description (EEOC, n.d.). Additionally, in Texas employers are required to pay their employees a minimum of $7.25 as well as provide employees with an earnings statement. Consequence for violating the Equal Pay Act include but are not limited to a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment up to six months. The final area I would like to mention is Harassment, it is unlawful to harass an individual